Believing Change and Changing Belief
نویسنده
چکیده
We present a rst order logic of time chance and probability that is capable of expressing the relation between subjective probability and objective chance at di erent times Us ing this capability we show how the logic can distinguish between causal and evidential correlation by distinguishing between condi tions events and actions that in uence the agent s belief in chance and the agent believes to in uence chance Furthermore the semantics of the logic captures common sense inferences concerning objective chance and causality We show that an agent s sub jective probability is the expected value of its beliefs concerning objective chance We also prove that an agent using this represen tation believes with certainty that the past cannot be causally in uenced
منابع مشابه
The correlation between believing in resurrection and attitudes toward death among elderly people
Background & Objectives: Since believing in resurrection and life after death exists in all religions, streng thening this belief leads to positive emotional states, increases adaptation to adverse life events, reduces the fear of death and gives a meaning to life. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the correlation between belief in the hereafter and the attitude of death in the...
متن کاملModels and Neural Bases of the Believing Process
Departing from the long debates on the role of faith/belief, recent interdisciplinary research has turned to characterize the features of the psychophysical processes underlying believing. Here we review recent cognitive neuroscience models of the believing process and propose a conceptual framework that integrates current theoretical and empiric knowledge about the processes of believing. Ther...
متن کاملA general non-probabilistic theory of inductive reasoning
Probability theory, epistemically interpreted, provides an excellent, indeed th e best available account of inductive reasoning. This is so because there are general and definite rules for the change of subjective probabilities through information or. experience; induction and belief change are one and same topic, after all. The most basic of these rules is that one simply has to conditionalize...
متن کاملOn what inferentially justifies what: the vices of reliabilism and proper functionalism
Yet there are restrictions: a justified belief can inferentially justify a belief in some propositions but not others. Suppose I justifiably believe (J) that Jones ate pizza last night. My justified belief in J can, by itself, inferentially justify me in believing (S) that someone ate pizza last night. 2 Maybe I won’t be justified in believing S because I have a defeater. But S is at least a ca...
متن کاملThinking Is Believing
The idea that people can entertain propositions without believing them is widespread, intuitive, and most probably false. The main goal of this essay is to argue against the claim that people can entertain a proposition without believing it. Evidence is presented demonstrating that we cannot withhold assent from any proposition we happen to consider. A model of belief fixation is then sketched ...
متن کامل